Prop 36 creates controversy

Reported by: Tony Botti
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 11/07/2012 6:28 pm
69% of California’s voters said yes to Prop 36 and 31% said no.  The passage revises the three strikes law, allowing judges to impose a life sentence only when the new felony conviction is serious or violent. It's estimated to save the state around $70 million a year.

“You’re placing dangerous criminals back out on to the streets and they're a ticking time bomb,” said Mike Reynolds, author of the 3 Strikes Law.

Mike Reynolds is the man who authored the 3 strikes law back in 1994, which quickly cut California’s crime rate in half.  Needless to say, he's not happy that voters chose to alter it.

“You've taken a huge tool away from both our courts and law enforcement,” said Reynolds.
     
The way it's been working is that anyone with two prior serious or violent convictions gets a mandatory 25 years to life sentence after committing a third felony of any kind.

“It was unfair, it was draconian and it was going to lead to severe crowding in the prison,” said Mark Coleman, a criminal defense attorney.

Defense attorney Mark Coleman likes how voters have changed the requirement to where the third strike must now be serious or violent.

“Simple possession of marijuana, simple possession of cocaine.  Those people need treatment, not life in prison,” said Coleman.

There is an exception in all of this.  Those convicted of rape, murder or child molestation must still serve a life sentence even if their third strike is non-serious or non-violent.

As of March 2012, 9,000 inmates were classified as third strikers.  Under Prop 36's guidelines, about 3,500 are expected to be released, which worries Fresno County Sheriff Margaret Mims.

“The public is going to be suffering the consequences, but deputy sheriffs and police officers on the street are now going to be dealing with these repeat felons again,” said Fresno Co. Sheriff Margaret Mims.

They won't be under the supervision of parole or probation agents.  However, Sheriff Mims says they'll be on her department's radar.

“We'll be paying special attention to those people,” said Sheriff Mims.

It's estimated to save the state around $70 million a year.

Share
2 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KGPE CBS47 TV

Ombudsman - 11/10/2012 6:27 AM
0 Votes
As A Supporter of Prop. 36 I say that "The Passage of Prop. 36 is Long Over Due!" I Will Start My Campaign Tour To Other States Jan 28 2013 To Ensure That We Continue Fighting for The Human Rights of All Americans! The Passage of Prop. 36 is about Human Rights and it was not about Penal Codes Vs. Criminals. Bishop L. J. Guillory, Ombudsman General

condolf - 11/8/2012 4:42 AM
0 Votes
Of course Mark Coleman is delighted, he's a lawyer who stands to make money off of the law. He could care less how many innocent people will be killed or injured because of the release of violent criminals, not to mention the added cost of additional court time.
Fresno Current Conditions
81°
High: 85° | Low: 53°
Mostly Cloudy
Comment Instructions
  1. You must be a registered user to post a comment to the CBS47 website.


  2. Registration is quick and painless. We only need your name, email and date of birth.


  3. Registration allows you to also post events on the event calendar and videos and photos to the User Generated Content galleries.


  4. To post a comment, just click on the "Add a Comment" button at the bottom of any story on our website.


  5. No profanity or inappropriate comments will be allowed.


  6. Offensive posters will be blocked from future postings.
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.
KGPE TV CBS47 - Serving the Counties of Fresno, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced and Tulare
in the Central San Joaquin Valley of California