Debate Heating Up Over Proposed Madera Casino

Reported by: Tony Botti
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 2/13 8:48 am
The debate is once again heating up surrounding construction of a new Native American casino. The North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians plans to put the casino off of its reservation, west of Highway 99 at Avenue 17. That's just outside the Madera city limits.

Not everyone supports the idea, saying it will hurt local businesses and congest traffic.

A meeting was held Sunday at the Valley West Christian Center in Madera.

The federal government has approved the Mono Indian proposal but it still needs Governor Jerry Brown's consent, so folks are signing letters and sending them to the governor, urging him to take a stance against the casino.

Opponents say building the facility would set a terrible precedent by opening the flood gates for more off-reservation casinos.

It would encourage tribes to shop locations around the state and setup anywhere they could make the biggest bucks.

A similar proposition is taking place north of Sacramento.

Stand Up for California, an organization focused on all gambling issues, says this goes against Prop 1-A, which voters passed in 2000 to allow tribal gaming only on Indian lands.

Cheryl Schmit with Stand Up For California said, "Tribes promised and gave their word. We changed our Constitution to provide gaming for Indians, so this proposal by the North Fork is in direct conflict to that promise."

The North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians believes it can boost the economy by making agreements with the county and city to provide money for law enforcement, fire and road improvements. At one point, the casino was expected to bring in $25 million a year in tax revenue to the state. However, a recent court ruling said it's illegal to tax tribes, so it's unclear how much the state would benefit from another casino.

Mary-Ann McGovran with North Fork Mono Rancheria said, "It's about jobs to the community and everybody knows that here in Madera. We have strong local support; we have over 5,000 individual support forms signed by Madera County residents."
Share
5 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of KGPE CBS47 TV

Lt2Harris - 2/19/2012 3:04 PM
0 Votes
Why do we citizens of California Vote, It seem to me that everything that is put on the ballot that is passed or rejected by the people, can be overruled by a judge, or some politicization. Why put anything of the ballot, our vote means nothing. The people have spoken and passed it on the ballot so let it be.

weeno2 - 2/15/2012 7:31 PM
0 Votes
http://www.maderacountylibrary.org/reservation.html http://tpl.consensusdev.com/content/historical-fresno-river-farm-reservation/sieAAA792A6D1A8B2B66 The links above support the statement below which were not written by me The new Indian reservation near the current City of Madera was plagued from the start. These ‘first farmers of the San Joaquin Valley’ faced multiple obstacles to successful cultivation, including harsh farming conditions, neglectful and corrupt administrators, and encroaching settlers who impinged upon the official reservation lands. To survive, Natives supplemented meager reservation yields with traditional subsistence activities in the familiar environs of the surrounding foothills and rivers. By 1860, after barely a decade, the Federal Government abandoned the reservation and farms and ancestors of the Tribe, who a decade earlier had rights to millions of acres, were now landless

Resident888 - 2/13/2012 9:51 PM
1 Vote
The town hall meeting on Sunday Feb. 12 was not orchestrated by rich tribes from outside of Madera, It was sponsored by the Madera Ministerial Association who adamantly oppose off site gaming. Gaming tribes all over California oppose off-site gaming not because of competition, they oppose it because up to this point all tribes in California that have built casinos, have built them on their native lands, whether these lands were classified as reservation land, allotment land, or Rancherias. North Fork may not have an official “reservation” as Tribal Fairness puts it, but neither does Picayune RANCHERIA of the Chukchansi Indians and yet they built their casino on their Rancheria. Jackson Rancheria Casino, same story, their casino was built on their land. North Fork has a Rancheria (IN NORTH FORK) just like Chukchansi and Jackson Rancheria. North Fork would not have the opposition they have if they were building their Casino on their Rancheria in North Fork. The land in Madera was purchased by Stations Casino, a Rich Corporate Casino from Las Vegas. Now Stations Casino is trying to exploit North Fork’s tribal sovereignty so they can have a casino in California. What is really scary about this situation, and why EVERYONE in Madera should oppose this casino, is if Rich Corporate Casinos, like Stations Casino, are able to successfully circumvent Proposition 1A and exploit tribal sovereignty, it will set a precedence and open the door for other Las Vegas Corporate Casinos, like Harrah’s and MGM to start buying land in urban areas in California like San Francisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, and any other urban area that may be considered a lucrative markets, then partner with a California tribe to have their casino. The precedence being set, Las Vegas Casino’s will be able to build casinos ANYWHERE in California. Keep Indian Gaming on Indian Land, Stop Las Vegas Casinos from exploiting California tribes to build casinos in California.

weeno2 - 2/13/2012 9:21 PM
0 Votes
Within the first years of its existence, the Fresno River Reservation, created as a result of the 1851 treaties, operated as a series of small “Indian farms”, including the Fresno River Farm, which was located in the immediate vicinity of the present-day City of Madera and which soon became the headquarters for the entire reservation. Many Northfork Mono and other local tribes consequently relinquished their traditional lands and nomadic ways and moved to the Fresno River Farm/Reservation. Eventually, the Mono outnumbered those from any other tribal designation on the reservation, where they sought protection and assistance and participated in farming. The new Indian reservation near the current City of Madera was plagued from the start. These ‘first farmers of the San Joaquin Valley’ faced multiple obstacles to successful cultivation, including harsh farming conditions, neglectful and corrupt administrators, and encroaching settlers who impinged upon the official reservation lands. To survive, Natives supplemented meager reservation yields with traditional subsistence activities in the familiar environs of the surrounding foothills and rivers. By 1860, after barely a decade, the Federal Government abandoned the reservation and farms and ancestors of the Tribe, who a decade earlier had rights to millions of acres, were now landless.

TribalFairness - 2/13/2012 11:15 AM
1 Vote
This was a PR event orchestrated by rich gaming tribes mostly from outside Madera who don't want any competition. They flood into a community spewing their misinformation (example, this cannot be "reservation shopping" because the North Fork Tribe has no official "reservation") usually uniting with the strange bedfellows or evangelical Christian churches -- exactly the groups who were the "front" for this event.
Fresno Current Conditions
81°
High: 85° | Low: 60°
Partly Cloudy
Comment Instructions
  1. You must be a registered user to post a comment to the CBS47 website.


  2. Registration is quick and painless. We only need your name, email and date of birth.


  3. Registration allows you to also post events on the event calendar and videos and photos to the User Generated Content galleries.


  4. To post a comment, just click on the "Add a Comment" button at the bottom of any story on our website.


  5. No profanity or inappropriate comments will be allowed.


  6. Offensive posters will be blocked from future postings.
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.